<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>CIRCUMSTANTIAL PROOF: The Case Against Nancy Brophy</title>
        <link>https://peertube.gravitywell.xyz/videos/watch/4a7934f8-4bfc-4b3e-ac34-e1709cf1f8d6</link>
        <description>Nancy Brophy was convicted of murdering her husband with no eyewitness, no DNA, and no recovered murder weapon (...sort of). This deep dive examines how circumstantial evidence — peripheral security footage, purchase history, financial records, and more — proved strong enough for a conviction. We break down the timeline, Nancy’s testimony, and whether “circumstantial” really means “weak.” #NancyBrophy #truecrimecommunity Nancy's full testimony for those interested in checking it out: Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/live/tnEC53ioh1Q?si=1KBq_l5Ar9DJEAol Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/live/LvXZGRc6eds?si=IQ7u1W4-w0VLuB-E Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwRF8ddWWbg&amp;t</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:08:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>PeerTube - https://peertube.gravitywell.xyz</generator>
        
        <copyright>All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified in the terms specified at https://peertube.gravitywell.xyz/about and potential licenses granted by each content's rightholder.</copyright>
        <atom:link href="https://peertube.gravitywell.xyz/feeds/video-comments.xml?videoId=4a7934f8-4bfc-4b3e-ac34-e1709cf1f8d6" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    </channel>
</rss>